Safety & Technology Features
Mazda equips most models with i-Activsense, its advanced safety suite, which includes adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and automatic emergency braking. Even older Mazdas from 2018 onward often come with these features, adding extra value for high-mileage buyers.
Comparison Table: Mazda vs Competitors After 100,000 Miles
| Model (2025) | Avg. Annual Maintenance | Reliability Score (CR) | Resale Value at 5 Years | Common Issues Reported |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda3 | $450 | Above Average | ~55% | Minor suspension wear |
| Mazda CX-5 | $480 | Above Average | ~53% | Brake pad replacement |
| Toyota Corolla | $400 | Excellent | ~60% | Minimal issues |
| Nissan Altima | $500 | Average | ~45% | Transmission problems |
Pros and Cons of Mazda
Pros
- Strong reliability ratings after 100,000 miles
- Affordable annual maintenance costs
- Engaging driving experience
- Advanced safety features, even on older models
Cons
- Slightly higher depreciation than Toyota or Honda
- Smaller dealer network in the U.S.
- Limited availability of hybrid or EV options compared to competitors
Pros and Cons of Competitors
Toyota
- Pros: Best-in-class resale value, very low maintenance
- Cons: Less sporty driving feel, higher upfront prices
Nissan
- Pros: Lower initial purchase cost, frequent dealer discounts
- Cons: Lower resale value, inconsistent reliability
Who Should Choose Mazda vs Competitors?
- College Students or First-Time Buyers: Mazda3 is a great option with sporty handling and affordability, but Toyota Corolla may last longer with fewer issues.
- Families: Mazda CX-5 offers strong safety and comfort, while Honda CR-V remains a more fuel-efficient long-term option.
- Daily Commuters: Mazda sedans and crossovers are reliable for long drives, but Toyota wins in pure cost savings.
- Budget-Conscious Buyers: Nissan is cheaper upfront, but long-term costs often make Mazda the smarter buy.
Expert Opinions & Customer Reviews
- A J.D. Power Dependability Study ranked Mazda above industry average in 2024, showing fewer issues reported after three years of ownership.
- Edmunds owners frequently praise Mazda’s driving performance, even after 100,000 miles.
- A Mazda CX-5 owner from Ohio shared: “I bought my CX-5 new in 2016, and now with 125,000 miles, it still runs smoothly with only brake and tire replacements.”
- By contrast, a Nissan owner commented: “I saved money upfront, but repairs after 90,000 miles have cost me thousands.”
Final Verdict: Is a Mazda Worth It After 100,000 Miles?
Yes, Mazda is a reliable long-term choice for U.S. drivers. Real-world data shows Mazdas remain dependable well past 100,000 miles, with affordable maintenance and solid resale value. While Toyota and Honda may edge out Mazda slightly in longevity and depreciation, Mazda strikes an excellent balance between fun, reliability, and affordability. For drivers who want a car that feels engaging while also being cost-effective over the long run, Mazda is well worth considering.
